Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:23:27 -0500
From:  David Corbin <dcorbin@imperitek.com>
Subject:  [webricken:47] Re: Forward, Include
To:  webricken@notwork.org
Message-Id:  <3C914D0F.8010704@imperitek.com>
References:  <3C8F98EA.2050809@imperitek.com> <20020315.081113.46633269.gotoyuzo@kotetsu.does.notwork.org>
X-Mail-Count: 00047

GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:

>In message <3C8F98EA.2050809@imperitek.com>,
> `David Corbin <dcorbin@imperitek.com>' wrote:
>
>>I'm looking to build a framework that among other things may involve 
>>building pages by forwarding/including content from other (local) URLs. 
>>
My (envisioned) framework is more driven by Struts and Enhydra 
experience, picking the best of both worlds

>
>Is it like RequestDispacher of JServlet?
>
>There is no functionality for dispatching another
>servlet which correspond to URL.  And users must make
>the functions to share information (such as session)
>between servlets.
>
>On the other hand, users can mount any frameworks on
>WEBrick.  Here's Div; a framework which gathers the
>pieces of HTML like `include' directive. It works on
>WEBrick and CGI.
>
>  http://www.jin.gr.jp/~nahi/RWiki/?cmd=view;name=Div
>
>>Does webrick have any work in progess in this direction?   I suppose the 
>>broader question would be, is there a roadmap for webrick?
>>
>
>First, I think that quality and usabilty of the
>exsiting components should be raised.  HTTPRequest,
>HTTPResponse, etc..
>
>We wants to make the built-in session management and
>request dispatching mechanism.
>But, the sufficient experience does not exist yet.
>
>Any comments (and code) are welcome.
>
RequestDispatch won't be too hard, I don't think.  I think if 
RequestDispatch is "done right", it'll meet my needs.  I'll see if I can 
do a patch for it.

Session mgmt would definately be harder

>
>--
>gotoyuzo
>
>