Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:32:35 +1200
From:  Holden Glova <dsafari@xtra.co.nz>
Subject:  [webricken:57] Re: request attributes and handler creation (OT)
To:  webricken@notwork.org
Message-Id:  <20020320072725.ZAW4403.mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz@there>
In-Reply-To:  <3C97D8FB.8090306@imperitek.com>
References:  <000b01c1ce75$b56fe7f0$85222fc0@sarion.co.jp> <20020320.063519.103024541.gotoyuzo@kotetsu.does.notwork.org> <3C97D8FB.8090306@imperitek.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00057

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:34, David Corbin wrote:
> GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
> >In message <3C967342.6040204@imperitek.com>,
> >
> > `David Corbin <dcorbin@imperitek.com>' wrote:
> >>b) request attributes - I modeled this on java servlets, but there is
> >>probably a more ruby-esque way to do this.  It makes forward much more
> >>useful.
> >
> >It is not clear for me what the name of "attribute"
> >suggests in HTTP message.
>
> It was modeled on the Java servlets, much like the rest of this seems to
> be.  In J2EE(servlets/JSP), "attributes" exist at four different scopes
> - Application, servlet, request, and page, if I remember correctly.

First off - I really want the ability to be able to forward and include so 
I'm glad that work is being done towards this. I can get around the include 
stuff easily by using erb but would prefer for a more consistent way of doing 
this.

I think the 4 different scopes you are referring to are application, session, 
request, and page.

- -- 
Signed,
Holden Glova
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8mDsU+mF116Lw2cQRAj3xAJsGcOwMRzfRCNuJ1rbBxRw9kX9IiQCfY7HD
HgkQzIuUNjZlo13GcCJP3/o=
=Ffo2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----